<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcasting equipment and recording: Behind the scenes of PhotoNetCast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html</link>
	<description>PhotoNetCast brings you the photography topics that matter, whether you are a newcomer, photography enthusiast, semi-pro or even a photography professional.  We highlight the latest news, discuss photography equipment (dSLR cameras, photography lighting, accessories, etc.), workflow, tips and tutorials, as well as discuss in-depth topics to help you improve your photography from both a business and creative prespectives.  Hosted by Antonio Marques, Jim Goldstein, Brian Auer and Martin Gommel, PhotoNetCast has a very conversational format in which both digital photography and film photography are discussed in an open and entertaining way.  Our guests, people who matter in the digital photography world, bring additional value to the show and share their perspectives in today&#039;s photography.  Whatever your level is in photography, whether you express your creativity through digital or film photography, we are confident you will enjoy our discussions on PhotoNetCast and we hope you join us for every show.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:30:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Hi Antonio,

Great solution, but I still have some concerns with the cables coming and going to the notebook. In my case, I think I have everything else OK. However, I am planning to use an Alesis Multiumix Firewire mixer and Garageband. Before I do my first connection, I would like to clarify the cable settings from my notebook to the mixer. So, I need a 1/8” plug to 1/4” plug cable from notebook Headphone Line Out to one of Mixer MIC Line In, and then another similar cable from the Aux Sends from the mixer to the notebook Audio Line In. One last question is there any problem using stereo cables or I need to use stereo to mono. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Antonio,</p>
<p>Great solution, but I still have some concerns with the cables coming and going to the notebook. In my case, I think I have everything else OK. However, I am planning to use an Alesis Multiumix Firewire mixer and Garageband. Before I do my first connection, I would like to clarify the cable settings from my notebook to the mixer. So, I need a 1/8” plug to 1/4” plug cable from notebook Headphone Line Out to one of Mixer MIC Line In, and then another similar cable from the Aux Sends from the mixer to the notebook Audio Line In. One last question is there any problem using stereo cables or I need to use stereo to mono. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Marques</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Marques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-657</guid>
		<description>Hi,

At the moment, we do all the recording &quot;off-air&quot; and publish it as podcast only. With this setup, inserting &quot;live&quot; bumpers gets tricky because the only sound being fed back into skype for everyone on the line to listen is only my voice (otherwise you get the feedback loop that I mentioned). I can&#039;t be specific about shoutcast since I&#039;ve never used it. Nonetheless, if you have a USB-interface with an output option besides the USB (or you can use the master mix from the board), I believe that you can feed it into your line-in port on the computer (NOT the mic input) and use that port with shoutcast. It will take a little trial and error, but I&#039;m sure it is possible. The problem with feeding everything back into skype is always the feedback loop, your co-host will start listen to himself with some delay. 
Hope this helped somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>At the moment, we do all the recording &#8220;off-air&#8221; and publish it as podcast only. With this setup, inserting &#8220;live&#8221; bumpers gets tricky because the only sound being fed back into skype for everyone on the line to listen is only my voice (otherwise you get the feedback loop that I mentioned). I can&#8217;t be specific about shoutcast since I&#8217;ve never used it. Nonetheless, if you have a USB-interface with an output option besides the USB (or you can use the master mix from the board), I believe that you can feed it into your line-in port on the computer (NOT the mic input) and use that port with shoutcast. It will take a little trial and error, but I&#8217;m sure it is possible. The problem with feeding everything back into skype is always the feedback loop, your co-host will start listen to himself with some delay.<br />
Hope this helped somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberty Unleashed</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberty Unleashed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 07:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-656</guid>
		<description>Great set-up and explanation.  The USB Interface might help me solve my problem.  Do you do a live show on air or website and then podcast it or just podcast?  I want to do live through my site using shoutcast and then podcast the live show.  My co-host is in another state and we use Skype.  Now I need to be able to play bumber music and commercials through the system and have my co-host on hearing it and get a clean recording for podcasting.  Anybody deal with this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great set-up and explanation.  The USB Interface might help me solve my problem.  Do you do a live show on air or website and then podcast it or just podcast?  I want to do live through my site using shoutcast and then podcast the live show.  My co-host is in another state and we use Skype.  Now I need to be able to play bumber music and commercials through the system and have my co-host on hearing it and get a clean recording for podcasting.  Anybody deal with this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Marques</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Marques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-547</guid>
		<description>Hello mr. haynes,

As I mentioned, I prefer to have both channels on a single track. That way, when editing I don&#039;t have to worry about out-of-sync problems. In any case, you can start recording on 2 mono tracks with one selected for the left channel and the other for the right. In any case, if you&#039;re using a similar setup to mine, you will still need to pan the inputs on the mixer.
Don&#039;t know if this was much of a help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello mr. haynes,</p>
<p>As I mentioned, I prefer to have both channels on a single track. That way, when editing I don&#8217;t have to worry about out-of-sync problems. In any case, you can start recording on 2 mono tracks with one selected for the left channel and the other for the right. In any case, if you&#8217;re using a similar setup to mine, you will still need to pan the inputs on the mixer.<br />
Don&#8217;t know if this was much of a help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr. haynes</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>mr. haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-542</guid>
		<description>My question is how to you split channels into different tracks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is how to you split channels into different tracks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Marques</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Marques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-530</guid>
		<description>Thanks.
If you use skype for the phone call, then it&#039;s just the same. You mentioned that you can have music from an external device going into the mixer and that is absolutely true, but if you don&#039;t plan on any live streaming I&#039;d say go for inserting the music in post-production. You&#039;ll have a much better control on the volume and fades. But as you mentioned, it&#039;s very much possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.<br />
If you use skype for the phone call, then it&#8217;s just the same. You mentioned that you can have music from an external device going into the mixer and that is absolutely true, but if you don&#8217;t plan on any live streaming I&#8217;d say go for inserting the music in post-production. You&#8217;ll have a much better control on the volume and fades. But as you mentioned, it&#8217;s very much possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uwe Mayer</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>Uwe Mayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-529</guid>
		<description>Great stuff! Thank you so much for your explanation, it inspired me while setting up my own gear. Including a simple phone call in a podcast can be done in the same way and I could throw in music from an external device (ipod) directly on the mixer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff! Thank you so much for your explanation, it inspired me while setting up my own gear. Including a simple phone call in a podcast can be done in the same way and I could throw in music from an external device (ipod) directly on the mixer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-526</guid>
		<description>Wow you are fast Antonio,

Exactly what I needed to know!

Thanks again,
Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow you are fast Antonio,</p>
<p>Exactly what I needed to know!</p>
<p>Thanks again,<br />
Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Marques</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Marques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-525</guid>
		<description>Hi Ray,
Thanks for your comment.

This all depends on what you want to do. From my understanding of your comment, you have the 502 and an iMic USB adapter. If you intend only to record the sound coming from your microphone, then you only need that 1x 2 RCA to 1/8&quot; cable and the XLR cable. You&#039;ll want to connect the CD/Tape out to your IN on the USB interface. I&#039;m not familiar with the iMic, but if it is in any way similar to my Edirol, it shows up as different sound driver. The second RCA to 1/8&quot; you mentioned connecting the USB OUT to the board is really not going to be necessary as you&#039;re not feeding any sound from the computer into the mix and back into the computer again. If you want to insert any sound clips, I&#039;d do it in processing with software. The difference is, if you wish to insert sound clips while streaming live. In this case, I&#039;d connect your out on the computer (not on the USB interface) to one line-in channel on the board using a 1/8&quot; to 2 1/4&quot; cable so that you can actually easily control the volume.
You mention that you&#039;re not using the headphones jack. If you&#039;re going to be talking on a microphone, use it. You&#039;re microphone technique will improve greatly if you can monitor yourself while speaking. This was one of the main reasons for me to go with the mixer option and not just with a XLR to USB interface.

I hope this helped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ray,<br />
Thanks for your comment.</p>
<p>This all depends on what you want to do. From my understanding of your comment, you have the 502 and an iMic USB adapter. If you intend only to record the sound coming from your microphone, then you only need that 1x 2 RCA to 1/8&#8243; cable and the XLR cable. You&#8217;ll want to connect the CD/Tape out to your IN on the USB interface. I&#8217;m not familiar with the iMic, but if it is in any way similar to my Edirol, it shows up as different sound driver. The second RCA to 1/8&#8243; you mentioned connecting the USB OUT to the board is really not going to be necessary as you&#8217;re not feeding any sound from the computer into the mix and back into the computer again. If you want to insert any sound clips, I&#8217;d do it in processing with software. The difference is, if you wish to insert sound clips while streaming live. In this case, I&#8217;d connect your out on the computer (not on the USB interface) to one line-in channel on the board using a 1/8&#8243; to 2 1/4&#8243; cable so that you can actually easily control the volume.<br />
You mention that you&#8217;re not using the headphones jack. If you&#8217;re going to be talking on a microphone, use it. You&#8217;re microphone technique will improve greatly if you can monitor yourself while speaking. This was one of the main reasons for me to go with the mixer option and not just with a XLR to USB interface.</p>
<p>I hope this helped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-524</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I&#039;m wrong Antonio, but I think I figured out the answer to my last question: what cables I need.

2 x 1/8&quot; Mini to 2 RCA Male Connector similar to something like this (http://www.amazon.com/Recoton-ACW339-Audio-Cable-Connector/dp/B00006HOIT/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=musical-instruments&amp;qid=1239698490&amp;sr=1-1).

Is that all? Thanks to all with suggestions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong Antonio, but I think I figured out the answer to my last question: what cables I need.</p>
<p>2 x 1/8&#8243; Mini to 2 RCA Male Connector similar to something like this (<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Recoton-ACW339-Audio-Cable-Connector/dp/B00006HOIT/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=musical-instruments&amp;qid=1239698490&amp;sr=1-1" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Recoton-ACW339-Audio-Cable-Connector/dp/B00006HOIT/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=musical-instruments&amp;qid=1239698490&amp;sr=1-1</a>).</p>
<p>Is that all? Thanks to all with suggestions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-523</guid>
		<description>Hello Antonio,
Awesome stuff!  Truly, I appreciate the time and effort you spent on explaining this to everyone. I just purchased a Xenyx mixer, and when it arrived in the mail I realized how much learning was involved just to get the thing up and running. 

Your schematic diagram was just the thing I was looking for.  While I have the 502 series, the basics seem to be the same. 

For people not recording skype calls such as myself, how would the setup differ?  I will just be recording myself on podcasts.

Also, I was wondering if you could provide a list of cables and quantity necessary for the entire setup (such as 1 x RCA to 1/8 inch, 2x 1/8 inch to 1/4 inch converters, etc.)

Here was my understanding: 
1. Mic to Mic Preamp #1 via XLR cable
2. Mixer output (CD/Tape) to USB Interface (iMic) &#039;In&#039; to laptop
3. Mixer input (CD/Tape) to USB Interface (iMic) &#039;Out&#039; to laptop
Done//

I&#039;m not sure if this is a correct setup... and I haven&#039;t seemed to utilize the LINE IN 2/3 (mono or balanced), MAIN OUT, &amp; PHONES jacks. 


Love your show
Thanks Antonios,
Regards, 
Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Antonio,<br />
Awesome stuff!  Truly, I appreciate the time and effort you spent on explaining this to everyone. I just purchased a Xenyx mixer, and when it arrived in the mail I realized how much learning was involved just to get the thing up and running. </p>
<p>Your schematic diagram was just the thing I was looking for.  While I have the 502 series, the basics seem to be the same. </p>
<p>For people not recording skype calls such as myself, how would the setup differ?  I will just be recording myself on podcasts.</p>
<p>Also, I was wondering if you could provide a list of cables and quantity necessary for the entire setup (such as 1 x RCA to 1/8 inch, 2x 1/8 inch to 1/4 inch converters, etc.)</p>
<p>Here was my understanding:<br />
1. Mic to Mic Preamp #1 via XLR cable<br />
2. Mixer output (CD/Tape) to USB Interface (iMic) &#8216;In&#8217; to laptop<br />
3. Mixer input (CD/Tape) to USB Interface (iMic) &#8216;Out&#8217; to laptop<br />
Done//</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if this is a correct setup&#8230; and I haven&#8217;t seemed to utilize the LINE IN 2/3 (mono or balanced), MAIN OUT, &amp; PHONES jacks. </p>
<p>Love your show<br />
Thanks Antonios,<br />
Regards,<br />
Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Marques</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Marques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-464</guid>
		<description>Hello Richard,

That&#039;s just Brian&#039;s voice... can&#039;t change it. Kidding...

The main problem is that the perfect equalization settings for each person I have with me are very different, but Skype returns everything on one channel so there is no way I can setup a different equalization for each. Maybe I can check if their soundcards allow for output equalization BEFORE the sound goes into Skype. And what about in general? Does the show sound better after we changed the setup or it&#039;s worse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Richard,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just Brian&#8217;s voice&#8230; can&#8217;t change it. Kidding&#8230;</p>
<p>The main problem is that the perfect equalization settings for each person I have with me are very different, but Skype returns everything on one channel so there is no way I can setup a different equalization for each. Maybe I can check if their soundcards allow for output equalization BEFORE the sound goes into Skype. And what about in general? Does the show sound better after we changed the setup or it&#8217;s worse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Marques</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Marques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-463</guid>
		<description>Hi Scratchy,

In my compressing pass I use a threshold of -10dB, margin of -0.1dB, attack time of 4ms and release time of 300ms.
It&#039;s probably not the best setting, but it works and truthfully I still did not play too much with it.
Thanks for your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scratchy,</p>
<p>In my compressing pass I use a threshold of -10dB, margin of -0.1dB, attack time of 4ms and release time of 300ms.<br />
It&#8217;s probably not the best setting, but it works and truthfully I still did not play too much with it.<br />
Thanks for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Wong</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-462</guid>
		<description>That is some serious work Antonio. Thanks for sharing. One thing I would like to note is that Brian&#039;s voice sounds like he is talking out of a metal box at times at least when I listen through my iPod in my car radio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is some serious work Antonio. Thanks for sharing. One thing I would like to note is that Brian&#8217;s voice sounds like he is talking out of a metal box at times at least when I listen through my iPod in my car radio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scratchy</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Scratchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-449</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to write it all up. The diagram is great, about as easy as it could be to explain something like that. What software are you using and is there any options in the &quot;compression algorithm&quot; or do you simply select it an let it run?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to write it all up. The diagram is great, about as easy as it could be to explain something like that. What software are you using and is there any options in the &#8220;compression algorithm&#8221; or do you simply select it an let it run?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-446</guid>
		<description>Nice write up Antonio. The diagrams and pictures make it easier to understand by a long shot.

Glad that you wrote about the solution that you have found for recording Skype. Me I am very seriously considering a digital mixer and doing it directly from there directly to recording software. See Ep 12 of Podcasters Emporium - thinking of something similar to James&#039; set up (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.podcastersemporium.com/2009/03/episode-12-ins-and-outs-of-mixers.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Episode 12: The Ins and Outs of Mixers&lt;/a&gt;)

This set up is defiantly not the easiest thing in the world to sort out - seems you have a great handle on it though and it works! You have to be happy with what and how your doing it and your sound is good so you must be doing something right.

Nice work mate and thank you very much for the mention, much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice write up Antonio. The diagrams and pictures make it easier to understand by a long shot.</p>
<p>Glad that you wrote about the solution that you have found for recording Skype. Me I am very seriously considering a digital mixer and doing it directly from there directly to recording software. See Ep 12 of Podcasters Emporium &#8211; thinking of something similar to James&#8217; set up (<a href="http://www.podcastersemporium.com/2009/03/episode-12-ins-and-outs-of-mixers.html" rel="nofollow">Episode 12: The Ins and Outs of Mixers</a>)</p>
<p>This set up is defiantly not the easiest thing in the world to sort out &#8211; seems you have a great handle on it though and it works! You have to be happy with what and how your doing it and your sound is good so you must be doing something right.</p>
<p>Nice work mate and thank you very much for the mention, much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Marques</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Marques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-445</guid>
		<description>Hello Sean,

I see your blog search is working ok. 

I&#039;m going to take the bait on this one. So, with your solution I need 3 pieces of hardware, with mine, 4. &quot;All that hardware...&quot;? I have the feeling that you&#039;re assuming I use the mixer just as a way to connect the microphone. Very different from reality. If that was the case I would have chosen a USB mic.

Now, I see how the product your company sells might be a good solution for portability, having the preamp powered by the USB, and it has it&#039;s own purpose by itself. If you notice, I mention that Jim uses a similar setup and with similar goals so I&#039;m not in any way detracting from it. 

I&#039;m sure that it also works very well if the podcast is not a conference call but just one person. With the way we do it, and with me recording on my side, such a setup as what you suggest would make it impracticable. First, I like to be able to equalize both my voice and my co-hosts&#039; before it&#039;s converted back to digital. Also, as I mentioned, I want to be able to record to two different locations using one as the main recording and one as backup. Third, I&#039;m not really understanding how using that setup you&#039;re able to monitor your own voice (which to me is very important to improve microphone technique). 

As I stated, I&#039;m sure that our setup is not the best, but knowing that the product your company sells has roughly the same price as my mixer, and not needing the portability, the choice was obvious.

Anyway, thanks for your input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Sean,</p>
<p>I see your blog search is working ok. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to take the bait on this one. So, with your solution I need 3 pieces of hardware, with mine, 4. &#8220;All that hardware&#8230;&#8221;? I have the feeling that you&#8217;re assuming I use the mixer just as a way to connect the microphone. Very different from reality. If that was the case I would have chosen a USB mic.</p>
<p>Now, I see how the product your company sells might be a good solution for portability, having the preamp powered by the USB, and it has it&#8217;s own purpose by itself. If you notice, I mention that Jim uses a similar setup and with similar goals so I&#8217;m not in any way detracting from it. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that it also works very well if the podcast is not a conference call but just one person. With the way we do it, and with me recording on my side, such a setup as what you suggest would make it impracticable. First, I like to be able to equalize both my voice and my co-hosts&#8217; before it&#8217;s converted back to digital. Also, as I mentioned, I want to be able to record to two different locations using one as the main recording and one as backup. Third, I&#8217;m not really understanding how using that setup you&#8217;re able to monitor your own voice (which to me is very important to improve microphone technique). </p>
<p>As I stated, I&#8217;m sure that our setup is not the best, but knowing that the product your company sells has roughly the same price as my mixer, and not needing the portability, the choice was obvious.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for your input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.photonetcast.com/2009/podcasting-equipment-and-recording-behind-the-scenes-of-photonetcast.html/comment-page-1#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonetcast.com/?p=68#comment-443</guid>
		<description>omg, one MicPort Pro would eliminate all that hardware except for the mic and the headphones... and it&#039;s portable (powered by USB bus)

http://www.centrance.com/products/mp/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omg, one MicPort Pro would eliminate all that hardware except for the mic and the headphones&#8230; and it&#8217;s portable (powered by USB bus)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.centrance.com/products/mp/" rel="nofollow">http://www.centrance.com/products/mp/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
